Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score From Nongated Chest CT Scans Compared With Gated Scans and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events.

Authors

Dhiran Verghese, Robert Trujillo, Divya Abraham, Robyn L McClelland, April Kinninger, Sanjay Manubolu, Jairo Aldana, Robert J Cubeddu, Douglas Drachman, Ignacio Inglessis-Azuaje, Dee Dee Wang, Akl Fahed, Lyndia Brumback, Michael J Blaha, Matthew Allison, Matthew J Budoff

Published in

Circulation. Volume 154. Issue 4. Pages 302-312. Jul 28, 2026. Epub Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

Data on the prognostic value of incidental coronary artery calcium (CAC) from nongated chest computed tomography scans are limited. Using paired computed tomography scans from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) exam 5, we evaluated the relationship between nongated CAC, gated CAC, and future cardiovascular events.
Between April 2010 and December 2011, a total of 2601 participants underwent same-day gated and nongated chest computed tomography scans. After excluding 106 with previous coronary heart disease or cardiovascular disease and 23 for missing covariates, 2472 participants formed the study population. Gated and nongated scans were interpreted at a core laboratory, blinded to acquisition methodology. Cox regression examined associations between CAC (gated and nongated) and incident coronary heart disease/cardiovascular disease events. Correlation was assessed with Pearson coefficients, model performance with receiver operating characteristic curves and C-statistic, and overall accuracy with Brier scores.
Among the 2472 participants, 53% were female, 38% white, 13% Chinese, 26% Black, and 23% Hispanic/Latino. Compared with participants with zero CAC, those with moderate (101-299) and severe (≥300) nongated CAC had higher coronary heart disease risk (hazard ratio, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.14-6.27]; hazard ratio, 5.22 [95% CI, 2.37-11.5]) and cardiovascular disease risk (hazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.32-4.04]; hazard ratio, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.68-4.96]). Gated and nongated log-standardized CAC highly correlated (r=0.961; P<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, C-statistic, and Brier scores were statistically similar for gated and nongated CAC.
Nongated CAC predicts cardiovascular events with performance comparable to gated CAC. Given the large number of nongated scans performed annually, incorporating their quantification into clinical practice offers a scalable approach to personalized preventive care. Our findings are particularly relevant in light of the recent 2026 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association dyslipidemia guidelines, which endorse the use of incidental CAC from nongated computed tomography scans for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk stratification and guiding lipid-lowering therapy.

PMID:
42507772
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.