Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Clinical outcomes of ascending aortic replacement for aneurysm and the impact of center volume: a nationwide population-based study.

Created on 28 Jul 2026

Authors

Sue Hyun Kim, Jinhee Kim, Yoonjin Kang, Suk Ho Sohn, Yeiwon Lee, Ho Young Hwang, Kyung Hwan Kim, Mi-Sook Kim, Jae Woong Choi

Published in

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Jul 27, 2026. Epub Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate contemporary outcomes of elective ascending aortic replacement (AAR) and the impact of center volume using a nationwide database.
Adults undergoing elective AAR for aneurysms (2003-2021) were identified from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Acute dissections, ruptures, and arch involvements were excluded. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) and multivariable regression evaluated the impact of institutional volume and concomitant procedures.
Among 5,209 patients, operative mortality and stroke rates were 2.9% and 2.2%. Over a 5.9-year median follow-up, RCS revealed a significant non-linear inverse relationship between annual institutional volume and mortality. Treatment at high-volume centers (≥10 cases/year) independently lowered operative mortality (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.37) and long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.73). Distinct clinical phenotypes, including bicuspid aortic valves and concomitant aortic valve surgery, were associated with favorable survival.
Elective AAR demonstrates low perioperative risk and stable long-term survival, significantly influenced by annual institutional volume and clinical phenotypes. These findings support dedicated aortic centers and individualized risk stratification.

PMID:
42507896
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement