Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

FGFR4-associated APOBEC3 mutagenesis characterizes HER2-enriched subtype of human breast cancer.

Created on 28 Jul 2026

Authors

Ju-Yul Jeong, Chae-Yi Kim, A-Reum Nam, Je-Yoel Cho

Published in

British journal of cancer. Jul 27, 2026. Epub Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

Characterising somatic mutation profiles in human breast cancer (HBC) is essential for understanding tumour progression and guiding therapeutic strategies.
We performed genomic and transcriptomic analyses to profile the mutational landscape of HBC. In addition to our primary analysis of HBC, we conducted comparative genomic analyses to evaluate the extent to which these mutational processes are recapitulated in canine mammary tumour (CMT), a widely proposed translational model.
APOBEC3 (A3)-associated mutations were extensive in HBC but largely absent in CMT, likely due to structural differences in A3 proteins and lower basal expression. Transcriptomic stratification of HBC by A3 activity uncovered that tumours with A3 activity showed a strong association with the PAM50-HER2-Enriched (HER2E) subtype, and FGFR4 was significantly correlated with the expression and enzymatic function of APOBEC3A/B.
These findings demonstrate that CMT is an unsuitable model for A3-mediated mutagenesis, emphasising the need to consider the limitations of cross-species mutational modelling in comparative oncology. Moreover, this study identifies a potential regulatory association between FGFR4 and A3, offering insights into the underlying mechanisms of A3-driven mutagenesis and suggesting that the FGFR4-A3 activity could be considered alongside other molecular biomarkers for the classification of the HER2E subtype.

PMID:
42509465
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement