Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cohesin haploinsufficiency and inv(16) cooperate to reinforce Fli1 gene transcriptional programs during acute myeloid leukemia initiation and maintenance.

Created on 28 Jul 2026

Authors

Alison E Meyer, Katelyn E Heimbruch, Kirthi Pulakanti, Cary Stelloh, Nataly Cruz-Rodriguez, Josiah Murray, Dandan Wang, Lisa Latzko, Sebastian Vosberg, Philipp A Greif, Lucio H Castilla, John A Pulikkan, Subramaniam Malarkannan, Sridhar Rao

Published in

Leukemia. Jul 27, 2026. Epub Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

Core binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemias typically harbor the translocations t(8;21) or inv(16). As cohesin mutations are less commonly observed with inv(16) than with t(8;21), we hypothesized that they may negatively impact inv(16)-driven AML. Using a mouse model of inv(16) with haploinsufficiency of the cohesin subunit Smc3, we paradoxically found that inv(16); Smc3Δ/+ mice have a reduced leukemic latency compared to inv(16); Smc3+/+ mice, disproving our initial hypothesis and instead suggesting a role for cohesin loss in enhancing inv(16)-driven disease. Consistent with the known role of cohesin haploinsufficiency in altering chromatin accessibility, we demonstrated an increase in chromatin accessibility in inv(16); Smc3Δ/+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) prior to leukemia development, with an enrichment for Fli1 DNA binding motifs. Through scRNA-seq on pre-leukemic HSPCs, we observe an increase in Fli1 expression and enhanced Fli1 target expression in ST-HSCs. We further show that Fli1 is essential for the maintenance stage of inv(16); Smc3Δ/+ AML. Our data demonstrate a role for cohesin loss in enhancing the aggressiveness of inv(16)-driven AML and identify Fli1 as a previously unrecognized therapeutic vulnerability in cohesin-mutated AML.

PMID:
42509256
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement