Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

PSMA Therapy Grey Zones: Actinium, Lutetium, or Terbium for the Future of Radioligand therapy?

Created on 28 Jul 2026

Authors

Valentino Dragonetti, Francesco Mattana, Francesco Ceci

Published in

European urology focus. Jul 27, 2026. Epub Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

Radioligand therapy targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been established as a key treatment for PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following the approval of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu). However, variable responses, resistance, uncertain treatment sequencing, and limited efficacy in selected biological settings remain major clinical challenges. This narrative perspective reviews the rationale for radionuclide selection in PSMA-targeted therapy.
A nonsystematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed, updated to April 2026, prioritizing registered trials and multicenter studies.
177Lu remains the clinical benchmark owing to randomized evidence, favorable logistics, posttherapy imaging, and a well-defined safety profile. Its β-emission crossfire effect is useful in bulky or heterogeneous disease but may be less effective against micrometastatic or PSMA-low/aggressive clones. Actinium-225-based targeted α-therapy offers high linear energy transfer radiation and may overcome β-emitter resistance, although side effects, imaging limitations, and supply constraints remain concerns. Terbium-161 (161Tb) may provide a valid alternative with potential advantages in small-volume disease.
Early data with 161Tb- and Lead-212-based PSMA therapies are promising but require prospective comparative validation. Future progress will depend on matching radionuclide properties to tumor biology rather than identifying a universally superior isotope.

PMID:
42509121
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement