Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association of the cardiometabolic index and depressive symptoms with cardiovascular disease in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3: A prospective cohort study.

Created on 28 Jul 2026

Authors

Yuehua Li, Yang Ding, Jing Yang, Junpeng Zhai, Wei Tian, Yizhan Wang

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 16. Issue 1. Jul 24, 2026. Epub Jul 24, 2026.

Abstract

The progressive nature of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome (CKM) allows early intervention during stages 0-3. However, the role of the cardiometabolic index (CMI) across CKM stages 0-3 and its potential synergy with depressive symptoms remain unclear. We followed 5,556 CHARLS participants (aged ≥ 45, CKM stages 0-3) for 7 years. Higher CMI and cumulative average CMI (CumCMI) were independently associated with CVD (HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 1.27, P trend = 0.009; HR for high vs. low CumCMI: 1.28, P trend < 0.001). Nonlinear thresholds were 0.47 (CMI) and 2.08 (CumCMI). Among 2,595 participants with complete depressive symptoms data, those with high CumCMI alone (HR = 1.61) or depressive symptoms alone (HR = 1.43) had elevated risk, whereas those with both factors had the highest risk (HR = 2.08). Baseline AUC was 0.651; adding CMI alone yielded no improvement (0.651), whereas adding depressive symptoms alone raised it to 0.657; both together gave 0.657-0.658. However, additive interaction was not statistically significant, and the AUC improvement from adding depressive symptoms to a model already containing CMI was minimal (ΔAUC ≈ 0.007), suggesting that this combined indicator may be more suitable for population-level risk stratification than individual clinical prediction.

PMID:
42509284
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement