Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Differentiation of White and Red Galangal Rhizomes by Pseudo-Targeted LC-MS/MS Metabolomics.

Created on 29 Jul 2026

Authors

Elan Hernadi, Eti Rohaeti, Widodo, Mohamad Rafi

Published in

Chemistry & biodiversity. Volume 23. Issue 7. Pages e71508.

Abstract

The rhizomes of white galangal (Alpinia galanga) and red galangal (Alpinia purpurata) are valued as herbal medicines and pesticides. However, these two plants may exhibit differing bioactivities and side effects due to variations in their metabolite compositions. Differentiating the rhizomes of the two plants in dried, chopped, or powdered form can be challenging, raising concerns about misidentification and fraud. This study aimed to distinguish between the two rhizomes using a pseudo-targeted metabolomics approach integrated with multivariate analysis and MS/MS spectra-based molecular networking. Metabolites were extracted via ultrasonic treatment in methanol, followed by untargeted LC-MS Q-Orbitrap and pseudo-targeted LC-MS triple quadrupole analyses. Principal component analysis (PCA) effectively separated the two rhizomes and highlighted metabolite features contributing to this separation. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) clustered samples by plant type and location, and also showed differences in metabolite distribution patterns. Molecular networking, interpreted in conjunction with PCA loading scores, revealed distinct molecular cluster patterns. Finally, the study confirmed that differences in metabolite composition and molecular patterns enable accurate differentiation. This approach offers a reliable method for authenticating rhizomes, ensuring herbal quality control, and preventing counterfeiting.

PMID:
42520172
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement