Reinterpreting the matched-sibling relapse penalty in ATG-based allogeneic transplantation for myelodysplastic neoplasms: a question of dose, not donor.

Authors

Naif I AlJohani

Published in

Annals of hematology. Volume 105. Issue 8. Jul 29, 2026. Epub Jul 29, 2026.

Abstract

Park and colleagues recently reported, in a single-centre Korean cohort of 391 adult patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) receiving fludarabine-busulfan conditioning and antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based prophylaxis, that matched sibling donor (MSD) recipients experienced a substantially higher 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (34.3%) than recipients of unrelated (UD; 16.4%) or haploidentical (HID; 16.8%) donors, with reduced acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the MSD arm. The authors conclude that under ATG-based prophylaxis, MSD may no longer be the optimal donor choice in MDS. We respectfully argue that this conclusion is constrained by two structural features of the cohort. First, ATG dose is severely confounded with donor type: 61.3% of MSD recipients received 10 mg/kg ATG versus 0% of HID recipients, a dose pattern that inverts standard clinical practice and overlaps a range in which independent evidence indicates impaired disease control without offsetting GVHD benefit. Second, the GVHD- non-relapse mortality pattern in the cohort is more consistent with a cumulative immunosuppression-intensity hypothesis than with a primary donor-source effect. We propose that the most clinically actionable inference is to re-examine ATG dosing in MSD transplants for MDS, rather than to displace MSD as a preferred donor.

PMID:
42525122
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.