Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Current landscape of formal units associated with continuous quality improvement and accreditation in U.S. medical schools.

Created on 29 Jul 2026

Authors

Michaela Jansen, Sonya E Sherrod

Published in

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. Jul 29, 2026. Epub Jul 29, 2026.

Abstract

Institutional approaches to accreditation and continuous quality improvement (accreditation/CQI) activities for undergraduate medical education programs vary. This study aims to describe the current landscape of formal units (offices and/or personnel) dedicated to accreditation/CQI across U.S. medical schools.
From September 20 to October 13, 2023, the authors conducted a search of the websites of all U.S. medical schools accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) to identify formal offices (including departments) and personnel roles responsible for accreditation/CQI-related functions. Accreditation/CQI-related functions were defined as having a name/title that includes terms such as strategic planning and monitoring, assessment, program evaluation, CQI, and LCME accreditation.
The authors searched the websites of all 157 LCME-accredited U.S. medical schools (as of September 21, 2023) to identify the academic affairs or medical education leadership and accreditation/CQI-related units. They identified 154 schools (98%) with an academic affairs or medical education leader, supporting the robustness of the search strategy. Related to accreditation/CQI unit identification, 62 schools (39%) had a formal accreditation/CQI office, while 119 schools (76%) had at least one personnel associated with these functions. Sixty-six schools (42%) had dean-level roles, 86 (55%) had director-level roles, and 58 (37%) had other staff dedicated to accreditation/CQI efforts.
Based on website content, most U.S. medical schools maintain some form of accreditation/CQI presence; however, there is notable variability in institutional approaches. These findings suggest a centralized, multilayered accreditation/CQI unit may represent a preferred or best-practice accreditation/CQI structure. National organizations may wish to consider developing guidance or benchmarks to encourage the adoption of best practices and promote greater consistency in accreditation/CQI infrastructure across U.S. medical schools.

PMID:
42525249
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 19
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement