Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Robotic-assisted intracorporeal radical cystectomy with modified ileal conduit reduces ureteroileal anastomotic stenosis risk: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

Created on 30 Jul 2026

Authors

Tengfei Gu, Roberta Gunelli, Ting Chen, Chen Wang, Yongtao Pan, Qinzhou Yu, Jie Li

Published in

Annals of medicine. Volume 58. Issue 1. Pages 2703361. Epub Jul 29, 2026.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an innovative robot-assisted totally intracorporeal antecolic modified ileal conduit procedure (robotic group) versus laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopic group) in bladder cancer patients, providing evidence for optimizing urinary diversion strategies and reducing associated complications.
From Jan 2023 to Oct 2025, 69 patients undergoing total cystectomy by one surgeon were enrolled; 23 received robotic surgery (KangDuo SR2000) and 46 laparoscopic. Baseline, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected. Primary endpoint: radiologically confirmed ureteroileal anastomotic stenosis; secondary: postoperative ileus, new upper urinary tract stones, 90‑day complications, and recovery indicators.
Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (all p > 0.05). The robotic group had significantly lower stenosis (0% vs 15.22%, p = 0.043), ileus (8.70% vs 28.26%, p = 0.043), and new stones (4.35% vs 21.74%, p = 0.046). Intraoperative blood loss was reduced (98.70±28.97 vs 155.00±65.76 mL, p < 0.001), but operative time was longer (249.7±19.7 vs 199.6±22.7 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in time to bowel function recovery or 90‑day complication rate.
Robot‑assisted intracorporeal radical cystectomy with modified ileal conduit ensures perioperative safety, lowers long‑term complications and blood loss despite longer operative time, suggesting it is a promising alternative; however, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

PMID:
42525819
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement