Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Smart Meter-derived Air Conditioning Penetration Rate Modifies the Association Between Ambient Temperature and Emergency Department Visits.

Created on 30 Jul 2026

Authors

Xiaping Zheng, McKenna Peplinski, Diego Ramos Aguilera, Kelly T Sanders, Stefanie Ebelt, Noah Scovronick, Peter Kalmus, Howard H Chang

Published in

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.). Volume 37. Issue 5. Pages 719-723. Sep 01, 2026. Epub May 18, 2026.

Abstract

Air conditioning data are typically available only at coarse spatial resolutions. We examined modifications of heat-morbidity relationships using finer spatial resolution - specifically, ZIP code-level air conditioning penetration rates derived from household-level smart meter electricity records in southern California (2015-2019).
We first estimated ZIP code-specific relative risk (RR) between heat-related emergency department visits and 4-day lagged temperatures at the 95th to 50th temperature quantile. Meta-regression was used to estimate effect modification, as measured by the ratio of RR.
Air conditioning penetration rates ranged from 23% to 96% (median = 79%). Among non-coastal regions, a 10% increase in air conditioning penetration was associated with lower heat and emergency department visit risk: ratio of RR = 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.68, 0.91) for dry bulb temperature and 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.70, 0.92) for wet bulb temperature. Air conditioning penetration did not modify heat-morbidity associations in coastal regions.
Our results indicate that neighborhoods with higher air conditioning penetration rates were associated with lower heat-related health risks in noncoastal regions.

PMID:
42525476
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement