Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Detection of mismatching visual kinematics during visuomotor incongruence: A comparison of spatially matched delays versus offsets along identical trajectories.

Created on 30 Jul 2026

Authors

Fanni Peters, Peng Wang, Jakub Limanowski

Published in

Psychonomic bulletin & review. Volume 33. Issue 6. Jul 29, 2026. Epub Jul 29, 2026.

Abstract

Introducing delays to visual movement feedback or displacing it in space is a common experimental manipulation to study the neurocomputational basis of self-other distinction. While both manipulations imply spatial (positional) mismatches, there are crucial differences between them, such as the asynchrony of higher-level visual versus motor kinematics (velocity, acceleration, etc.) resulting from added time delays. In this preregistered experiment, we used a continuous elliptical drawing task while presenting visual movement feedback that was congruent or incongruent (i.e., with an added constant time delay or offset). The task allowed the presentation of delayed and offset feedback along identical trajectories, while controlling for the presence of a spatial discrepancy by matching delay and offset levels. Detection and discrimination of delays and offsets was remarkably similar during execution, suggesting comparable perceptual thresholds for visuomotor mismatches resulting from asynchronous versus nonbiological visual kinematics. During mere passive observation of the same feedback, offsets could also be detected above chance level, in line with the known visual sensitivity to violations of kinematic invariants. However, the detection of offsets at medium levels was better during execution, suggesting a benefit of action for identifying nonbiological kinematics in visual movement feedback.

PMID:
42527756
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement