Who Is Recognized as a "Top" Plastic Surgeon? Gender Disparities and Surgeon Concentration in National Rankings.

Authors

Gabrielle Knauer, Andrew Kalra, Aryan Gupta, Carolyn Silverman, Jennifer Walden, Adam Walchak, Sameer A Patel

Published in

Aesthetic surgery journal. Jul 30, 2026. Epub Jul 30, 2026.

Abstract

Newsweek has published annual "America's Best Plastic Surgeons" rankings based on a peer-nomination survey for five years, now encompassing six aesthetic surgery categories that each identify the top 30 surgeons.
To evaluate gender representation, geographic distribution, and recurrence patterns among surgeons included in these national rankings.
All available ranked surgeons were reviewed (n=720). Surgeon gender and location were recorded. Duplicate entries were removed to identify unique surgeons. Recurrence across categories was evaluated.
Of the 720 rankings published, 149 unique surgeons were identified. 134 (89.9%) were male and 15 (10.1%) were female. Compared with their estimated 20% representation in the national workforce, female plastic surgeons were significantly underrepresented in the rankings (10.1% vs 20%; p=0.002). Each year, female representation was significantly lower than expected (2021, p=0.004; 2022-2025, all p<0.001). Compared with their respective inaugural years, the proportion of female surgeons decreased in four categories. 35.6% of surgeons (n=53) appeared in more than one category, averaging 2.3 additional category listings. In 2025, surgeons previously ranked within the same category had appeared on average 2.8 times before. Geographically, surgeons were located in the South (n=54), Northeast (n=52), West (n=29), and Midwest (n=14).
Significant gender disparities characterize the "America's Best Plastic Surgeons" lists, and redundancy patterns may indicate concentration among a limited subset of surgeons. Reevaluating survey methodology and the ranking process may improve representation and patient access to a more diverse selection of surgeons.

PMID:
42530434
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.