Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Aligning deep learning and interpretable models for blood cell classification: A dual-model framework for explainability.

Created on 31 Jul 2026

Authors

Magdalene Yeok Yu Cheong, Xinran Xu, Li Rong Wang, Timothy Xiao Jing Yeo, Hemalatha Shanmugam, Shu Ping Lim, Bingwen Eugene Fan, Xiuyi Fan

Published in

PLOS digital health. Volume 5. Issue 7. Pages e0001514. Epub Jul 30, 2026.

Abstract

Blood smear examination involves classifying cells by morphology under a microscope, a labour-intensive process prone to subjective variation. Recent deep learning models achieve strong performance in blood cell classification but remain as "black boxes", offering little clinical transparency. We propose a dual-model framework that pairs a deep YOLO (You Only Look Once) classifier with a shallow, interpretable explainer. YOLO performs classification and segmentation, while clinically informed features are extracted from segmented images to train the explainer on YOLO predictions. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) quantify feature importance, with discrepancies flagged as "other reasons" to enhance transparency. Evaluated on proprietary and public datasets (PBC, Raabin), YOLO achieved AUCs of 0.997, 0.994, and 1.000 respectively, with the explainer demonstrating strong alignment: Score-CAM activation maps agreed with SHAP-identified features. In a user study with 9 trained and qualified haematologists and laboratory medical technologists, predictions achieved 96.9% concurrence. This work shows that the coupling of deep learning with interpretable models improves the confidence of predictions while providing clinical meaningful insights.

PMID:
42531177
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement