Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Correlation between real sieving coefficient determined using novel lab-scale module and pore structure of hemodiafiltration membranes.

Created on 31 Jul 2026

Authors

Mizuki Ichikawa, Makoto Fukuda, Takuma Morikawa, Kousei Takeuchi, Kiyotaka Sakai

Published in

Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs. Volume 29. Issue 3. Jul 30, 2026. Epub Jul 30, 2026.

Abstract

The novel lab-scale hollow fiber membrane module was fabricated to determine the apparent sieving coefficient ([Formula: see text]) of commercial hemodiafiltration membranes, MFX-SW eco (polyethersulfone, Sample A) and NVF-P (polysulfone, Sample B), using the aqueous solution of dextran with a broader molecular weight distribution. All the molecular weight cut-off curves plotted as [Formula: see text] versus filtration flow rate (QF) exhibited smooth profiles without intersecting each other, showing distinct variations depending on QF across a wide range of molecular weights. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) observations revealed that the equivalent pore diameters of samples A and B were nearly identical at 23.0 ± 15.5 nm and 23.3 ± 15.5 nm, respectively. Although the surface porosity of sample A (14.5 ± 3.9%) was higher than that of sample B (10.2 ± 3.2%), the difference was not statistically significant. These numerical data were in excellent agreement with the qualitative morphological findings obtained from the FE-SEM images. Furthermore, it is suggested that the subtle structural differences between the two membranes are also reflected in the relationship between the real sieving coefficients ([Formula: see text]) calculated by using [Formula: see text] and the equivalent pore diameters. Since the lab-scale modules are fabricated relatively easily by hand, this methodology is extremely valuable to rigorously define membrane performance.

PMID:
42533176
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement