Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A biomimetic microphysiological system predicts the impact of sepsis therapeutics on neutrophil-endothelial dynamics.

Created on 31 Jul 2026

Authors

Dan Liu, Nazgol Esmalian Afyouni, Qingliang Yang, Svetllana Kallogjerovic, Bojana Gligorijevic, Satya Kunapuli, Laurie E Kilpatrick, Mohammad F Kiani

Published in

Lab on a chip. Jul 31, 2026. Epub Jul 31, 2026.

Abstract

Current preclinical models fail to capture human neutrophil-endothelial interactions central to sepsis, contributing to repeated failure of candidate therapeutics in clinical trials. Here, we present a biomimetic microphysiological system (bMPS) integrating primary human endothelial cells, human neutrophils and controlled chemoattractant gradients under physiological flow in a microvascular network. This platform enables real-time visualization of neutrophil adhesion and transmigration, along with quantitative analysis of endothelial barrier integrity. We demonstrate chemoattractant-dependent differential neutrophil recruitment to host-derived IL-8 and bacterial-derived fMLP and differential responses to two different therapeutics: the PAF receptor antagonist BN-52021 reduces recruitment in response to IL-8 but not to fMLP, whereas the PKC-δ inhibitor suppresses adhesion, transmigration, and NET formation to both IL-8 and fMLP. Confocal imaging and quantitative analysis demonstrate that Cytomix-induced endothelial barrier disruption in primary human lung microvascular endothelial cells (HLMVECs) is significantly ameliorated by BN-52021 and the PKC-δ inhibitor-restoring VE-cadherin integrity and reducing intercellular gaps. This bMPS provides a predictive, human-relevant platform for function-focused sepsis drug screening.

PMID:
42533817
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement