Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: impact on postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Created on 31 Jul 2026

Authors

Junfeng Du, Chen Su, Xiang Xu, Lanxin Hu, Xuefei Zhang, Hongyu Zhang

Published in

Frontiers in oncology. Volume 16. Pages 1881074. Epub Jul 16, 2026.

Abstract

Whether preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during transanal total mesorectal excision is beneficial remains unclear. This study evaluated the effects of LCA-preserving low ligation versus high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery without LCA preservation on anastomotic leakage.
We retrospectively reviewed patients with low rectal cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (January 2014-January 2024). After propensity score matching, 182 patients were assigned to LCA preservation (n = 91, low ligation) or non-preservation (n = 91, high ligation) groups according to whether the LCA was preserved. Perioperative characteristics, pathological findings, and incidence of anastomotic leakage were compared, and subgroup analyses were performed.
The incidence of postoperative leakage in the LCA preservation group was lower than in the non-preservation group (4.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.036). Among patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, LCA preservation was associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage rates (7.0% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.049).
LCA preservation may have clinical value in selected patients with low rectal cancer, particularly those receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

PMID:
42534770
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement