Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Curettage Versus Topical Treatment for Positive Superficial Margins After Mohs Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Tumor Recurrence.

Created on 31 Jul 2026

Authors

Ashley Khouri, Nathanael Jensen, Tejita Agarwal, Emily Beck, Eric Millican, Payam Tristani-Firouzi

Published in

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. Aug 03, 2026. Epub Aug 03, 2026.

Abstract

Positive margins of squamous cell carcinoma in situ or superficial basal cell carcinoma after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) occur in a small but clinically significant proportion of cases, with multiple management options available.
This study aimed to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) across different treatment modalities for positive margins after MMS to inform clinical decision making.
This was a retrospective cohort study of 422 patients with positive margins after MMS from 2012 to 2022. Recurrence-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, immunosuppression, tumor characteristics, and anatomic location.
Among 388 patients in the primary analysis (306 curettage, 82 topical treatment), 3-year RFS was 92.6% (95% CI: 89.4%-95.9%) for curettage versus 82.7% (95% CI: 73.1%-93.6%) for topical treatment (p=.021). Topical treatment was independently associated with increased recurrence risk (adjusted hazard ratio 2.73, p=.021) after controlling for risk factors. Immunosuppression was the only other significant predictor of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio 3.04, p = .036).
Curettage demonstrated superior 3-year RFS compared with topical treatment for positive margins after MMS, with an absolute difference of 9.9%. These findings support curettage as the preferred initial management approach for positive margins after MMS when clinically feasible.

PMID:
42536405
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement