Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Two differentiation pathways generate large peritoneal macrophages with one replenishing mesothelial border macrophages.

Created on 01 Aug 2026

Authors

Jichang Han, Alexandre Gallerand, Rachel L Mintz, Jing Chen, Feiya Ou, Shuai Gao, Daniel D Lee, Mandy M Chan, Michael T Harmon, Xue Lin, Bhama Ramkhelawon, Christopher G Huckstep, Michael R Strickland, Tiantian Liu, Kory J Lavine, Joel D Schilling, S Celeste Morley, Bernd H Zinselmeyer, Kenneth M Murphy, Gwendalyn J Randolph

Published in

Science immunology. Volume 11. Issue 121. Pages eaeg8653. Jul 31, 2026. Epub Jul 31, 2026.

Abstract

Peritoneal cavity fluid and mesothelial surfaces host distinct resident macrophage populations, among which include the well-described Gata6+ large cavity macrophages (LCMs) in peritoneal fluid. Here, we reveal that LCMs arise from two separable differentiation pathways. In the quantitatively minor pathway, monocytes gave rise to LYVE1+ LCMs but few Gata6+ LCMs. This pathway did not require the transcription factor Gata6 but was severely impaired in mice bearing three mutations in the -165 kb Zeb2 enhancer (Zeb2TM) with impaired monocyte development. The second, dominant pathway supported Gata6-dependent LCMs and was intact in Zeb2TM mice, even when turnover was enforced by irradiation, and was supported by adoptive transfer of a specialized LCM intermediate expressing Gata6 before the residency marker TIMD4. Functionally, the quantitatively minor LCM pathway distinctly surveilled the mesothelium, replenishing mesothelial border macrophages upon encountering an open niche. Thus, beyond embryonic versus adult hematopoietic paradigms, LCMs with overlapping and distinct phenotypes arise from two pathways linked to divergent fates.

PMID:
42536710
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement