Artificial intelligence tools for the assessment and management of dysphagia: a scoping review.

Authors

Elayidath Vasudevan Sreedevi, Subramania Iyer K, Krishnakumar Thankappan, Justin Roe, Vineetha Karuveettil, Chandrashekar Janakiram, Ramesh Guntha, Sanjeevi Gunasekaran, Jayakumar R Menon, Rahul Krishnan Pathinarupothi

Published in

BMJ open. Volume 16. Issue 7. Pages e119582. Jul 31, 2026. Epub Jul 31, 2026.

Abstract

To explore the existing artificial intelligence (AI) tools used in the assessment and management of dysphagia.
Scoping review.
MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Evidence Synthesis, ProQuest and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between January 2000 and May 2025.
Studies involving adults diagnosed with dysphagia that applied AI techniques for screening, diagnosis, prognosis or management were included. Non-human studies, paediatric-only studies, non-clinical simulations and studies without direct clinical application were excluded.
The review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, assessed full-text articles for eligibility and extracted data using a standardised data charting form. Data were synthesised using narrative synthesis.
A total of 4863 records were identified, of which 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 8842 participants. Most studies (21/27, 77.8%) published between 2013 and 2025 and conducted in the USA (9/27, 33.3%), South Korea (6/27, 22.2%), Japan (3/27, 11.1%) and China (3/27, 11.1%). The majority of studies (21/27, 77.8%) employed machine learning or deep learning approaches applied to videofluoroscopic swallowing studies, fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, wearable sensor data, acoustic signals or structured clinical datasets. Most studies are prospective (8/27, 29.6%) and retrospective (7/27, 25.9%) investigations; case series (3/27, 11.1%). Only one randomised controlled trial (1/27, 3.7%) evaluated AI-based dysphagia intervention. AI applications primarily focused on screening and assessment tasks.
The current literature demonstrates a growing body of AI-based tools for dysphagia assessment and screening, with comparatively limited evidence for management and rehabilitation applications. Most studies highlighting the need for large-scale and multicentre studies to support safe and equitable integration of AI into dysphagia care pathways.
DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/DYCE9.

PMID:
42538117
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.