Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Side-by-side evaluation of two Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus isolates in IFNAR-/- mice.

Created on 01 Aug 2026

Authors

Cornelius Rohde, Anke-Dorothee Werner, Michelle Gellhorn Serra, Petra Emmerich, Nataša Knap, Markus Eickmann, Stephan Becker, Verena Krähling, Alexandra Kupke, BSL4 Animal Facility Team

Published in

Npj viruses. Volume 4. Issue 1. Jul 31, 2026. Epub Jul 31, 2026.

Abstract

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is the causative agent of a severe hemorrhagic fever in humans, associated with case fatality rates up to 40%. Due to the lack of approved vaccines or specific antiviral treatments, CCHFV is classified as a biosafety level 4 (BSL4) pathogen in most countries and designated a priority pathogen by the World Health Organization. To facilitate the preclinical assessment of medical countermeasures, we have established a murine model using C57BL/6J IFNAR-/- mice, which lack the IFNα/β receptor, infected with the phylogenetically distinct CCHFV strains Afghanistan09-2990 (Afg09) and Kosovo Hoti (Hoti). Infection with both CCHFV strains in IFNAR-/- mice resulted in significant weight loss, with Afg09 infection leading to more severe clinical disease. Quantitative analysis of viral RNA revealed widespread viral dissemination across multiple organs. Detection of infectious virus varied by organ and strain. These results independently validate previously reported disease phenotypes while providing new insight into strain-specific differences in CCHFV pathogenesis in IFNAR-/- mice. Thereby, these CCHFV models represent valuable tools for the evaluation of antiviral therapeutics and vaccine candidates, enabling the investigation of cross-lineage protection against genetically diverse CCHFV isolates.

PMID:
42538375
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement