Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A metric for comparing complex systems by their dynamics.

Created on 01 Aug 2026

Authors

Mitchell Ostrow, Adam J Eisen, Leo Kozachkov, William T Redman, Ila Fiete

Published in

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. Jul 21, 2026. Epub Jul 21, 2026.

Abstract

Comparisons are fundamental to science: experiment against model, one organism against another, a system against itself across time. Because many systems, from brains to climate, are characterized by how they evolve in time, it is a natural goal to compare their dynamics. Dynamical systems comparison is well defined, but has been intractable for nonlinear, high-dimensional, noisy, and partially observed data. As a result, standard comparison metrics have focused on the geometry or topology of data. Here we present Dynamical Similarity Analysis (DSA), a class of methods to compare systems by their temporal evolution. Its foundation is Koopman Operator theory, which recasts nonlinear systems as linear operators. We estimate these operators from data, then compare the operators across systems. The computation is fast, scalable, and robust to noise and partial observation. It is also differentiable. DSA identifies dynamical structure that geometric and topological methods miss. It matches recordings from the head direction circuit to ring attractor models. It shows that macaque motor cortex dynamics for two reaching tasks drift apart across years despite preserved behavior, and that primary motor cortex breaks from premotor cortex as movement begins. As an optimization objective, it induces neural networks to learn never-before hypothesized solutions that run counter to their inductive biases. Thus, DSA transforms the dynamics of a system into an object that can be measured, compared, and optimized.

PMID:
42539270
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement