Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

ProteinDock: A physics-informed layer to improve protein-protein docking reliability.

Created on 01 Aug 2026

Authors

Gowrish Rajagopal, Søren C Spina, Joseph S Bailey, Blaise R Kimmel

Published in

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. Jul 20, 2026. Epub Jul 20, 2026.

Abstract

Computational modeling provides geometric insight into protein-protein interactions without requiring the resources of experimentation. However, reliability can be hindered when modeling proteins with distinctive features, such as antibodies, that use flexible, polar-rich loops to bind antigens. We developed ProteinDock , a physics-based tool that can be used in combination with leading modeling programs to improve the reliability of protein-protein docking; this work provides a case study of antibody-antigen interfaces. ProteinDock was layered onto Rosetta for docking unbound experimentally determined structures, and when evaluated on Docking Benchmark Set 5.5, generated CAPRI acceptable-quality or better for 80.2% of targets, an improvement of 32.8 percentage points over vanilla Rosetta's 47.4% on the same dataset. To improve protein-protein prediction reliability from sequence inputs, we demonstrate that a truncated version of ProteinDock can be used to choose the optimal prediction among outputs from multiple deep learning-based tools. We show that this strategy is a computationally efficient alternative to increasing the seed quantity for deep-learning predictions. A graphical user interface for layering ProteinDock has been created and is available at https://github.com/Kimmel-Lab/proteindock and https://proteindock.com/ .

PMID:
42539256
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement