Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Severe Diltiazem Poisoning Managed With CytoSorb Hemoadsorption and Supportive Therapies: A Case Report.

Created on 01 Aug 2026

Authors

Juul M Cox, Julia A M Verwaaijen, Ruben M F Hendriks, Dorien Smeets, Suzanne van Rijswijk, Tessa M Bosch

Published in

Critical care explorations. Volume 8. Issue 8. Pages e1454. Aug 01, 2026. Epub Aug 03, 2026.

Abstract

Severe intoxication with nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, such as diltiazem, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Evidence supporting extracorporeal treatment strategies remains limited. This case integrates serial toxicokinetic measurements with adjunctive hemoadsorption in sustained-release diltiazem poisoning.
A 73-year-old man presented with coma, complete atrioventricular block, refractory hypotension, and severe lactic acidosis. Despite optimized supportive therapy including vasopressors, calcium supplementation, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic therapy, and continuous renal replacement therapy, he remained hemodynamically unstable. CytoSorb hemoadsorption was initiated 6 hours after ICU admission. Shortly thereafter, sinus rhythm was restored, serum lactate rapidly declined, and vasopressor and insulin requirements were progressively reduced, allowing discontinuation of extracorporeal support. The patient recovered and was discharged home.
Retrospective analysis demonstrated elevated diltiazem concentrations with delayed, capacity-limited elimination. This case supports considering hemoadsorption in unstable patients with severe diltiazem poisoning despite conventional measures and highlights the need for systematic pharmacokinetic evaluation in future studies.

PMID:
42538738
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement