Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Haplotype and diversity signatures of ultra-soft selective sweeps in HIV-1.

Created on 01 Aug 2026

Authors

Elena V Romero, Dylan A Clark, Lillian B Cohn, Alison F Feder

Published in

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. Jul 22, 2026. Epub Jul 22, 2026.

Abstract

Many urgent medical and agricultural challenges are driven by resistance evolution via soft selective sweeps of multiple simultaneous mutations. Standard approaches to detect these mutations involve genome scans for regions with reduced diversity and increased haplotype lengths. However, it is unknown the extent to which those signatures persist as the number of mutations driving resistance grows. Here, we analyzed longitudinal linkage-resolved data from 10 intra-host HIV populations treated with broadly neutralizing antibody 10-1074. We found that HIV escapes 10-1074 with minimal perturbations to diversity and haplotype homozygosity in the region surrounding the sweep in the majority (8/10) of treated individuals. We matched these in vivo escape trajectories to forward simulations and found that adaptive mutations conferring escape must have been present on 20 or more genetic backgrounds to generate these signatures. These "ultra-soft" sweep signatures more closely resemble genetic patterns in a treatment non-responder without an adaptive response to 10-1074 than those of two other trial participants where adaptation occurred via harder selective sweeps. Our results demonstrate that HIV can adapt to a broadly neutralizing antibody treatment while retaining nearly all of its standing genetic diversity and that selection scans dependent on regional diversity and haplotype homozygosity signatures fail in this "ultra-soft" regime.

PMID:
42539188
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement