Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Diagnostic Testing After Positive Cell-Free DNA Screening for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies: Clinical and Socioeconomic Determinants.

Created on 02 Aug 2026

Authors

Blair K Stevens, Sarah Araji, Mohamad Ali Maktabi, Randy Liu, Lauren Westerfield, Michael Wassef, Dejian Lai, Ignatia B Van den Veyver, Meera Krishnan, Charlotte Lawrence, Siddharth K Prakash

Published in

Prenatal diagnosis. Aug 01, 2026. Epub Aug 01, 2026.

Abstract

To assess socioeconomic and medical factors associated with prenatal confirmatory diagnostic testing after positive prenatal cell-free (cfDNA) screening for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) in a diverse contemporary patient cohort.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had abnormal prenatal cfDNA screening results indicative of SCA and were seen for genetic counseling between 2014 and 2024 at two tertiary academic medical centers. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association of demographic and clinical factors with confirmatory testing.
Of the 692 patients with abnormal cfDNA results, 26% (n = 180) underwent diagnostic testing. These patients were older, resided in more affluent areas, presented earlier for genetic counseling, were more likely to have commercial insurance, and were less likely to prefer Spanish or use an interpreter. Compared to Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites, diagnostic testing rates were higher for NH Asians but were lower for NH Blacks and Hispanics or when results indicated XYY or XXX. In logistic modeling, lower deprivation scores and commercial insurance were independently associated with higher testing rates.
Only 1 in 4 patients pursued prenatal diagnostic testing following positive cfDNA screening for SCAs. Race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and preferred language were the primary determinants of testing.

PMID:
42542383
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement