Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Assessing the interplay of operative volume at the hospital and surgeon level for pancreatic cancer.

Created on 02 Aug 2026

Authors

Dhruv J Patel, Joseph H Cotler, Bryan Palis, Anthony D Yang, C M Schmidt, Ronald J Weigel, Karl Y Bilimoria, Ryan J Ellis

Published in

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. Jul 21, 2026. Epub Jul 21, 2026.

Abstract

The current retrospective study aimed to assess the interaction between surgeon-volume and hospital-volume on outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Patients with PDAC undergoing PD from 2008 to 2023 were identified using the National Cancer Database. Operative volumes of ≥20 cases/year defined high-volume hospitals (HVH) and ≥12 cases/year defined high-volume surgeons (HVS). Those below those thresholds were low-volume surgeons (LVS) and low-volume hospitals (LVH). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between surgeon/hospital volume and outcomes, relative to HVS/HVH.
The inclusion cohort consisted of 50,519 patients treated by 3155 surgeons operating at 976 hospitals. 90-day mortality declined with increasing volume: LVS/LVH = 6.4%, HVS/LVH = 5.7%, LVS/HVH = 4.0%, HVS/HVH = 3.5% (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing surgery by HVS/LVH [Odds Ratio (OR): 1.58, 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) (1.12, 2.24), p = 0.009] and LVS/LVH [OR: 1.59, 95%CI (1.24, 2.04), p < 0.001] had a higher adjusted likelihood of mortality. LVS/HVH was not associated with mortality compared with HVS/HVH. Both HVS/LVH [OR: 1.93, 95%CI (1.27, 2.92), p = 0.002] and LVS/LVH [OR: 1.60, 95% CI (1.15, 2.23), p = 0.006] had a higher likelihood of readmission.
Outcomes after PD for PDAC remain more greatly influenced by hospital-volume rather than surgeon-volume.

PMID:
42542416
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement