Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Molecular detection of Ehrlichia canis and Rickettsia rickettsii in tick-infested dogs from the city of Chihuahua, Mexico: phylogenetic analysis of the gp36 and ompA genes.

Created on 02 Aug 2026

Authors

Marcos Javier Sánchez Pérez, Guadalupe Gordillo-Pérez, Cecilia Rodríguez-Murillo, Susana Elvira García Vázquez, Anaid Ireri Hernández García, Gabriel Eduardo Acevedo-Jiménez, Hugo Ramírez Álvarez

Published in

Veterinary research communications. Volume 50. Issue 5. Aug 01, 2026. Epub Aug 01, 2026.

Abstract

Vector-borne diseases in dogs are an emerging problem worldwide due to their frequency, morbidity, and zoonotic relevance. Since there are no previous studies determining the frequency of Ehrlichia canis and Rickettsia rickettsii infection in three neighborhoods of the city of Chihuahua, Mexico, using molecular detection techniques, the objective of the present study was to detect, by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a fragment of the gp36 gene of E. canis and the ompA gene of R. rickettsii in tick-infested dogs captured at the canine control center of the city of Chihuahua, and to phylogenetically analyze the genotypes present. Blood samples were collected from 123 tick-infested dogs. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and used in nested PCR protocols. The results showed a positivity frequency of 16.2% (20/123) for E. canis and 3.2% (4/123) for R. rickettsii. Six sequenced samples corresponded to E. canis and four to R. rickettsii. Phylogenetic analysis showed a close relationship with sequences previously described in the United States. This is the first molecular identification confirming E. canis and R. rickettsii infection in tick-infested dogs from some neighborhoods of the Chihuahua city, Mexico.

PMID:
42541529
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement