In vitro evaluation of the microhardness of conventional and bulk-fill resins based on the depth of light-curing and the curing unit.

Authors

Vanessa Verónica Sara García-Mendoza, Rosa Josefina Roncal-Espinoza

Published in

Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. Volume 18. Issue 8. Pages e1015-e1020. Epub Jul 29, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate the microhardness of conventional and bulk-fill composite resins based on the depth of light-curing (2 mm and 4 mm) and the curing unit used (VALO Grand and BluePhase N G4 lamp).
Discs were fabricated using two bulk-fill resins: Beautifil Bulk (BB) and Filtek Bulk Fill (ZB); and two conventional resins: Beautiful II (BC) and Filtek Z350 XT (ZC). For the preparation, the light-curing depth was set at 2 and 4 mm, and the curing units used were VALO Grand and BluePhase N G4. Microhardness was measured using the Vickers test on light-cured samples under standardized conditions. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and the Tukey test (p < 0.05).
Significant differences were found between the groups, with the BB 4mm Valo group exhibiting the lowest microhardness values and significant differences compared to the others. Meanwhile, the 4 mm Bluephase ZC resin exhibited the highest microhardness values compared to the bulk-fill resin. At a thickness of 2 mm, the conventional resins showed similar values regardless of the polymerization source, except for BB, which performed better with the Valo unit. In addition, Valo demonstrated good performance with ZC at both thicknesses and results comparable to Beautifil II at 2 mm. Bluephase showed consistent values across all groups and depths, with superior performance when applied over ZC.
The results showed that the final microhardness of the restorative material is influenced by a combination of resin type, depth, and light-curing unit; the conventional composite resin that exhibited the highest microhardness values was ZC, light-cured using a Bluephase light source at a thickness of 4 mm, compared to the bulk-fill resin.

PMID:
42542852
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.