Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The Elusive Singularity: Alvan Feinstein and the Construction of a Science of Clinical Judgement.

Created on 02 Aug 2026

Authors

Diego Alejandro Estrada-Mesa

Published in

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. Volume 32. Issue 5. Pages e70537.

Abstract

Modern medicine remains marked by a persistent tension between general scientific knowledge and the singularity of individual patients. Alvan Feinstein's attempt to construct a "science of clinical judgment" offers an important examined response to this problem.
This article examines how Feinstein sought to integrate patient singularity into a rigorous epistemological framework and assesses whether his work should be understood merely as a precursor to Evidence-Based Medicine or as an alternative scientific pathway for clinical practice.
A narrative review was conducted using a pearl-growing strategy, beginning with Feinstein's primary works and expanding through their conceptual and bibliographic connections. This approach was complemented by targeted searches in PubMed and Scopus and by a historical-philosophical analysis informed by debates in the philosophy and history of medicine.
Feinstein transformed clinical judgment from a tacit, individual faculty into a structured, collective, and regulable practice. His project relied on the standardization of observation, refinement of clinical classifications, collective validation, and development of clinically meaningful measurements. Clinimetrics extended this project by making subjective, contextual, functional, and patient-centered phenomena scientifically intelligible without reducing them to biomedical mechanisms or psychometric abstractions. These findings indicate that Feinstein did not simply anticipate Evidence-Based Medicine; he developed a distinct epistemological approach centered on the systematic study of singular clinical realities.
Feinstein's work remains relevant because it shows that scientific rigor and attention to patient singularity need not be mutually exclusive. His project provides a critical framework for reconsidering the limits of Evidence-Based Medicine, personalized medicine, and contemporary approaches to clinical measurement.

PMID:
42542949
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 19
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement