Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Are Retromuscular Repairs Always the Best Option for Ventral Hernias? Augmented Evidence Review.

Created on 03 Aug 2026

Authors

Megan Melland-Smith, Nancy Ly, Sidhant Kalsotra, Marisa H Blackman, Michael J Rosen

Published in

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Pages 102539. Aug 02, 2026. Epub Aug 02, 2026.

Abstract

Ventral hernias account for over 600,000 repairs performed annually in the United States, and retromuscular repair has long been considered the technical gold standard for ventral hernia repair (VHR). However, whether its benefits extend uniformly across the full spectrum of hernia complexity remains uncertain. This study employs a novel Augmented Evidence Review (AER) methodology, integrating three complementary evidence streams, to evaluate whether retromuscular repair is always the optimal approach.
Three evidence streams were analyzed: (1) a retrospective analysis of 35,625 adult patients undergoing elective VHR with sublay mesh placement in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry; (2) surgeon polling conducted through the International Hernia Collaboration, an international surgeon social media forum; and (3) AI-generated literature synthesis using Open Evidence, with all cited sources manually verified.
Retromuscular utilization increased with defect size, from 5.0% for defects <3cm to 59.2% for defects measuring 5-10cm. Despite representing a more complex cohort (larger defects, more recurrent hernias, greater contamination), retromuscular repair demonstrated lower clinical recurrence at 1 year (6.2% vs 14.1%), but was associated with higher 30-day morbidity, including surgical site infection, readmission, and reoperation. Surgeon polling similarly identified the 5-10cm range as the threshold at which retromuscular repair becomes strongly preferred (67% of respondents). The AI-literature synthesis reinforced this size-dependent pattern, affirming retromuscular repair's superior recurrence profile for large and complex defects while identifying comparable short-term outcomes with preperitoneal or onlay repair, and lower associated morbidity, for small primary hernias ≤6cm.
Retromuscular repair remains an essential technique in ventral hernia surgery and appears to be preferentially utilized for larger and more complex abdominal wall defects. Contemporary evidence, expert opinion, and real-world practice patterns do not support a universal retromuscular strategy for all ventral hernias. Instead, mesh plane selection should be individualized according to hernia characteristics, patient factors, and operative objectives, with retromuscular reconstruction reserved for scenarios in which its unique reconstructive advantages are most likely to improve long-term outcomes.

PMID:
42543136
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement