Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

From Recognition to Reporting: One-year Trends in Adverse Drug Reactions at a Newly Designated Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center.

Created on 03 Aug 2026

Authors

Vasundhara A Londhe, Priti P Dhande

Published in

The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India. Volume 74. Issue 6. Pages 22-24.

Abstract

To analyze spontaneously reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during the first year after the adverse drug reaction monitoring center (AMC) recognition.
A retrospective observational study was conducted from April 2023 to March 2024 at a tertiary care hospital in Pune, Maharashtra, India. All reported ADRs were included and analyzed by gender, age, department, drug class, and severity (modified Hartwig and Siegel scale). Causality was assessed using Naranjo's algorithm and World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Center (WHO-UMC) assessment criteria. Data were expressed as frequencies and percentages.
A total of 255 ADRs were reported. Most ADRs occurred in elderly patients aged 61-80 years (56%). Anticancer drugs were the most common culprits (45.67%), followed by antimicrobials (21.63%). Causality assessments of suspected ADRs were probable (47%), possible (51%), and certain (2%). Most ADRs were mild (78.43%) and nonserious, and patients recovered with drug withdrawal and supportive care (39%), while 47% were recovering when the ADR was reported.
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were mild and preventable, with anticancer drugs being the leading cause. Elderly patients were most affected. Underreporting remains a challenge despite AMC recognition, underscoring the need for continued sensitization and feedback mechanisms to promote a culture of ADR reporting.

PMID:
42543927
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement