Clinical Outcomes of Double C-Loop Haptic Intraocular Lenses Across Different Optic Designs: A Retrospective Study.

Authors

Camille Bosc, Eloïse Le Malefan, Pauline Boury, Mélanie Bernier

Published in

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). Volume 20. Pages 617674. Epub Jul 29, 2026.

Abstract

To assess the visual, refractive, and rotational stability outcomes of double C-loop haptic intraocular lenses (IOLs) across different optic designs.
This retrospective study included 69 eyes implanted with PODEYE toric, Serenity toric, and FineVision HP toric IOLs (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. USA). A total of 23 eyes per group were analyzed at 3-months postoperatively. Subjective refraction, monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and rotational stability were evaluated in all cases.
In the PODEYE toric IOL group, 100% of eyes were within ±0.50D with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of 0.06±0.26D; in the Serenity toric IOL group, this percentage was 78.26% with a mean SE of -0.28±0.38D, while in the FineVision HP toric IOL group, 86.96% of eyes were within ±0.50D, with a mean SE of 0.22±0.30D (p<0.001). Mean CDVA was -0.02±0.04, -0.02±0.04, and -0.05±0.07 logMAR in the PODEYE toric, Serenity toric, and FineVision HP toric IOLs groups, respectively (p=0.047). In the PODEYE toric IOL group, 23.81% and 100% of eyes achieved a cumulative CDVA of ≥20/16 and ≥20/20, respectively. Corresponding values were 17.39% and 100% for the Serenity toric IOL group, and 52.17% and 95.65% for the FineVision HP toric IOL group. Mean IOL rotation was 1.09±0.79, 1.70±1.72 and 1.78±1.31 degrees for the PODEYE toric, Serenity toric, and FineVision HP toric IOLs groups (p=0.16). 100% of eyes exhibited rotation ≤10 degrees, and 100%, 91.30% and 100% of eyes in the PODEYE toric, Serenity toric, and FineVision HP toric IOLs groups, respectively, showed rotation ≤5 degrees (p=0.108).
Double C-loop haptic IOLs provide excellent refractive, distance visual acuity, and rotational stability outcomes across different optic designs.

PMID:
42544252
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.