Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Sensitivity of groundwater trend and homogeneity analyses to missing-data imputation methods (Middle Sebaou watershed, Algeria).

Created on 04 Aug 2026

Authors

Dahbia Djoudar Hallal, Ahmed Ferhati, Nour El Houda Belazreg, Ouahiba Aziez, Hakim Djafer Khodja

Published in

Environmental monitoring and assessment. Volume 198. Issue 9. Aug 04, 2026. Epub Aug 04, 2026.

Abstract

Incomplete groundwater level time series are common in monitoring networks and can bias homogeneity and trend analyses if not properly addressed. This study evaluates how different gap-filling strategies influence homogeneity detection and trend inference in groundwater level records from the Middle Sebaou Basin, northern Algeria. Four imputation approaches (Seasonal Trend decomposition with interpolation (STL), Kalman Smoothing, Moving Average Imputation, and Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE)) were assessed. Homogeneity and change-point behavior were examined using Pettitt and Buishand tests, while randomness was evaluated with the Von Neumann ratio test. Trend analyses were conducted using autocorrelation-corrected Mann-Kendall, Sen's slope estimator, and Innovative Trend Analysis. Results demonstrate that imputation choice substantially affects homogeneity outcomes and trend significance. MICE preserved temporal variability and reduced artificial change-point detection, whereas smoothing-based methods tended to dampen variability. The study highlights the necessity of selecting imputation methods consistent with groundwater system dynamics and provides a transferable framework for trend analysis in data-scarce aquifers.

PMID:
42547670
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement