Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Mucosal immune cell priming by intranasally delivered Haemophilus haemolyticus is associated with heterologous protection against influenza and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae.

Created on 04 Aug 2026

Authors

Jack S Pepper, Caitlyn M Granland, Sharon L Clark, Ruth B Thornton, Josephine Bayliss, M Z Edison Foo, Wesley Billingham, Naomi Scott, Alma Fulurija, Deborah H Strickland, Selma P Wiertsema, Peter C Richmond, Elke J Seppanen, Lea-Ann S Kirkham, M Christian Tjiam

Published in

Frontiers in immunology. Volume 17. Pages 1855464. Epub Jul 20, 2026.

Abstract

Intranasal vaccines offer a needle-free strategy to enhance immunity to respiratory infections. We investigated the mechanism of action of a novel intranasal vaccine using the human respiratory commensal Haemophilus haemolyticus (Hh), previously shown to protect against nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) otitis media and accelerate clearance of influenza A virus (IAV).
Mucosal and systemic cellular immune responses were assessed 2-144 hours after intranasal Hh treatment in mice, compared with placebo or the Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2-6 agonist Pam2CSK4 using spectral flow cytometry. The impact of treatment on subsequent IAV and NTHi challenge was also evaluated.
Hh induced a distinct, tissue-specific immune signature with rapid recruitment of neutrophils and inflammatory monocytes to the lungs, peaking at 6 hours, earlier than Pam2CSK4. Hh also generated higher proportions of nasal CD103+CD4+ T cells within 48 hours, which further expanded following sequential IAV and NTHi infection.
These findings demonstrate that Hh primes mucosal immune responses to promote heterologous protection.

PMID:
42548815
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement