Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Methodological Quality and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Fever Management in Children With Sickle Cell Disease.

Created on 04 Aug 2026

Authors

Elspeth Bittle, Tea Reljic, Ambuj Kumar, Jane S Hankins, Sheena Mukkada

Published in

Pediatric blood & cancer. Pages e70529. Aug 04, 2026. Epub Aug 04, 2026.

Abstract

Infection/sepsis remains the number one cause of death among children under the age of 5 with sickle cell disease (SCD). Although clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are an important tool for standardizing evidence-based care, the quantity and quality of existing CPGs for managing acute fever in children with SCD is unknown. We conducted a systematic review of CPGs published in the last 10 years addressing acute fever management in children with SCD. A PubMed search was conducted using standard search filters for CPGs, pediatrics, fever, and SCD. Additionally, a manual search of article citations, professional societies and consortia websites, and inquiries with experts was performed. CPGs were appraised by two reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument [http://www.agreetrust.org]. Results are summarized using descriptive statistics. The systematic and manual searches yielded 839 articles; 8 CPGs met inclusion criteria, but none were dedicated SCD acute fever CPGs. Geographic representation included France, India, Italy, Nigeria, sub-Saharan Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The mean overall quality score was 46% (range 25%-67%). Rigorously developed CPGs focused on managing acute fever in children with SCD are lacking. This work highlights the need to generate a high-quality evidence-based CPG for managing acute fever in pediatric SCD.

PMID:
42549946
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement