Mutations in filamentous bacteriophages spark eco-evolutionary feedbacks in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors

Noah S B Houpt, Catherine A Hernandez, Paul E Turner

Published in

The ISME journal. Aug 04, 2026. Epub Aug 04, 2026.

Abstract

Microbial populations strongly shape their environment, which can re-route adaptation toward organism-generated fitness optima. However, the conditions that promote these eco-evolutionary feedbacks are unclear. Here, we used experimental evolution to test whether high population density, by strengthening niche construction, drives eco-evolutionary feedbacks in the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa MPAO1. We then tested for adaptation to organism-modified environments by measuring the relative performance of ancestral and endpoint populations in filtrate generated by each evolutionary line sampled across generations. Contrary to expectations, we found that endpoint populations had higher performance than the ancestral strain in filtrate across nearly all evolutionary lines regardless of population density. This was caused by the emergence of hyperactive filamentous bacterio(phage) mutants during experimental passaging that inhibited the ancestral strain but not endpoint populations in modified media. Hyperactive phages emerged from one of two avirulent prophages in MPAO1's genome (Pf4 or Pf6). Hyperactive phages drove the evolution of phage resistance in bacterial populations via mutations in the type IV pilus (TIVP), the phage's binding receptor. In a follow-up experiment, we showed that these TIVP mutations pleiotropically reduced motility and decreased susceptibility to a TIVP-targeting virulent phage, both of which are important traits for P. aeruginosa infection and treatment. Overall, this work suggests that filamentous phage evolution can drive of eco-evolutionary feedbacks in bacterial populations, causing phenotypic and genetic changes that would not be anticipated from adaptation to the extrinsic environment alone.

PMID:
42550491
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.