Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Application of an extended information-motivation-behavioral skills model to predict HPV vaccine acceptability among Chinese gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.

Created on 05 Aug 2026

Authors

Qiufeng Liu, Li Ping Wong, Sin How Lim

Published in

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. Volume 22. Issue 1. Pages 2708426. Epub Aug 04, 2026.

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes substantial disease burden among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), yet HPV vaccination pathways for men remain evolving in mainland China.
To apply a culturally adapted, extended Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model to identify psychosocial pathways associated with HPV vaccine acceptability among Chinese GBMSM.
A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between December 2024 and January 2025 among 1,045 GBMSM living in mainland China. Measures included HPV-related information, health beliefs, anticipated regret, subjective norms, self-efficacy, and HPV vaccine acceptability. Measurement and structural equation models estimated direct and indirect pathways.
HPV vaccine acceptability was moderate (mean 3.40, SD 1.14). Subjective norms were the strongest predictor of acceptability (β = 0.68, p < .001), with additional positive effects from health beliefs (β = 0.17, p < .01), information (β = 0.14, p < .001), and self-efficacy (β = 0.13, p = .02). Anticipated regret showed a positive indirect effect through self-efficacy (unstandardized B = 0.056, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.12) but a negative direct association with acceptability (β = -0.11, p = .03).
HPV vaccine acceptability among Chinese GBMSM was shaped predominantly by social norms, with self-efficacy acting as a key pathway through which psychosocial factors were associated with acceptability.

PMID:
42550689
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement