Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

PSMA PET in Prostate Cancer: Clinical Value, Access Challenges, and Priorities for Implementation.

Created on 05 Aug 2026

Authors

Arthur Peyrottes, Léa Turpin, Laura Fernández Hernández, Juan Gómez Rivas, Morgan Rouprêt

Published in

European urology oncology. Aug 04, 2026. Epub Aug 04, 2026.

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) has become an integral component of contemporary prostate cancer (PCa) management, improving disease characterization in clinically relevant settings such as initial staging of higher-risk disease and biochemical recurrence. Beyond its superior diagnostic performance compared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET increasingly influences treatment planning, patient stratification, and multidisciplinary decision-making. However, despite growing incorporation into international clinical guidelines, access to PSMA PET remains heterogeneous across health care systems. Variability in reimbursement policies, regulatory frameworks, tracer availability, imaging capacity, referral pathways, and local expertise may limit timely access for eligible patients. These disparities have important clinical implications, potentially affecting staging accuracy, localization of recurrent disease, treatment selection, and equity of care. In this expert perspective, we discuss the evolving role of PSMA PET in PCa management, highlight the clinical consequences of unequal access, and identify key priorities to facilitate implementation across Europe. Improving access to high-quality PSMA PET should be regarded not only as a logistical objective but also as a clinical priority to ensure that advances in molecular imaging translate into more precise, timely, and equitable PCa care.

PMID:
42552166
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement