Predicting Dropouts of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Joint Modelling of Survival and Longitudinal Data.

Authors

Ângela Ferreira, Inês Sousa, Eugénia Ribeiro

Published in

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. Volume 33. Issue 4. Pages e70313.

Abstract

Understanding when and who is at greater risk of dropping out can help therapists and mental health professionals develop strategies to keep clients engaged, thereby improving the overall effectiveness of therapy. In the present study, we aimed to explore the hazard of dropout, both early and late in treatment, and evaluate the predictive power of both static (i.e., baseline client characteristics) and dynamic predictors (i.e., treatment process variables), in a sample of 97 clients treated with the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. Thirty-one clients (31.96%) discontinued treatment, with the highest dropout rate observed at the end of Session 4. Stratified Cox modelling showed a significant effect of younger age $\left({\beta }_1=-1.706,p=0.031\right)$ , non-student status $\left({\beta }_2=-1.715,p=0.031\right)$ and higher baseline anxiety severity $\left({\beta }_3=1.806,p=0.022\right)$ , on the risk of dropping out until Session 4 (i.e., the early phase of treatment). Beyond Session 4, only lower depressive severity measured at intake began to significantly affect the risk of dropout $\left({\beta }_8=-1.007,p=0.034\right)$ . Additionally, joint modelling (JM) of survival and longitudinal data for the early phase of treatment provided evidence of the predictive power of lower distress levels $\left({\gamma }_{01}=-0.181,p=0.093\right)$ and lower therapeutic alliance quality $\left({\gamma }_{02}=-0.137,p=0.05\right)$ on the clients' decision to discontinue treatment prematurely. After Session 4, no factor showed a significant association with dropout risk within the JM approach. The results suggest that early sessions are critical for the client's retention, and the JM approach is indispensable for studying psychotherapy dropout, especially in the context of endogenous time-varying predictors. Implications for clinical and research contexts are discussed.

PMID:
42554000
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.