Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Toxicity study of a novel composite dust suppressant in C57BL/6 mice.

Created on 05 Aug 2026

Authors

Hao Ding, Rongxia Yu, Zhian Huang, Junchuan Zhang, Xiangrui Meng, Longsheng Huang, Songyu Chen, Jinlu Chang, Yinghua Zhang, Asim Farooq, Jinhui Li, Yingjie Gao

Published in

Drug and chemical toxicology. Pages 1-14. Aug 05, 2026. Epub Aug 05, 2026.

Abstract

Construction dust is a major source of air pollution and easily causes intractable respiratory diseases such as pneumoconiosis. Dust suppressants are effective for dust control, yet most existing studies only focus on dust suppression performance, lacking systematic toxicological assessments, especially data on extrapulmonary multi-organ toxicity. In this study, SPF male C57BL/6 mice were used to establish three subchronic inhalation exposure groups: dust alone, dust suppressant alone, and co-exposure of dust and suppressant. Indicators including body weight, organ coefficients, blood routine, serum cytokines, and liver, kidney, and heart pathological lesions were detected to investigate the extrapulmonary multi-organ toxicity of an eco-friendly composite dust suppressant. The suppressant had little effect on mouse body weight. At appropriate concentrations (4-20 mg/m3), it inhibited dust-induced inflammatory responses and alleviated liver and kidney injuries. When the concentration reached 100 mg/m3, the suppressant interacted with dust to increase DNA oxidative damage markers, indicating potential genotoxic risks. This study fills the gap in extrapulmonary toxicological research of dust suppressants, provides references for toxicology evaluation and experimental basis for determining safe application concentrations on construction sites.

PMID:
42554370
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement