Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Identifying Discharge Delays: A Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Initiative.

Created on 05 Aug 2026

Authors

Kavya Bana, Kristin Myers, Katherine Woo, Jan Schriefer, Jack Bramley, Meghan K Train

Published in

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality. Aug 06, 2026. Epub Aug 06, 2026.

Abstract

In July 2021, our institution launched a program to begin documenting the medically ready for discharge date (MRDD) and the discharge delays (DDs) in the electronic medical record (EMR) to better allocate resources to streamline patient flow. The MRDD is the date at which a patient is deemed clinically stable for discharge by their medical team. DDs describe the reasons why a patient remains in the hospital beyond the MRDD. Our aim was to increase entry of DDs from 1.7% to ≥10% in hospitalized patients on a 26-bed Medicine unit between November 2023 and October 2025. The DD information would enable us to identify trends among vulnerable patient populations. We implemented Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles utilizing in-person and email communication by interdisciplinary teams as well as incorporating specific columns into the residents' EMR. We additionally stratified DD types based on the patient social vulnerability index. Since November 2023, the percentage of documented DDs for patients discharged beyond the MRDD was sustained above the target of 10% and peaked at 24% in October 2025. The most common themes of DDs were Placement, Disposition, Consult, and Home Coordination. We also found patients with higher social vulnerability index were disproportionately affected by DDs, including Consult, Home Coordination, and Transportation.

PMID:
42554249
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement