Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Bayesian joint additive factor models for multiview learning.

Created on 05 Aug 2026

Authors

Niccolo Anceschi, Federico Ferrari, David B Dunson, Himel Mallick

Published in

Biometrics. Volume 82. Issue 3. Jul 01, 2026.

Abstract

It is increasingly common to collect data of multiple different types on the same set of samples. Our focus is on studying relationships between such multiview features and responses. A motivating application arises in the context of precision medicine where multiomics data are collected to correlate with clinical outcomes. It is of interest to infer dependence within and across views while combining multimodal information to improve the prediction of outcomes. The signal-to-noise ratio can vary substantially across views, motivating more nuanced statistical tools beyond standard late and early fusion. This challenge comes with the need to preserve interpretability, select features, and obtain accurate uncertainty quantification. To address these challenges, we introduce two complementary factor regression models. A baseline joint factor regression (jfr) captures combined variation across views via a single factor set, and a more nuanced Joint Additive FActor Regression (jafar) that decomposes variation into shared and view-specific components. For JFR, we use independent cumulative shrinkage process (I-CUSP) priors, while for JAFAR, we develop a dependent version (D-CUSP) designed to ensure identifiability of the components. We develop Gibbs samplers that exploit the model structure and accommodate flexible feature and outcome distributions. Prediction of time-to-labor onset from immunome, metabolome, and proteome data illustrates performance gains against state-of-the-art competitors.

PMID:
42554212
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement