Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Assessing health beliefs and patient delay among breast cancer patients in West Sumatra, Indonesia.

Created on 06 Aug 2026

Authors

Ricvan Dana Nindrea, Armaita, Ainil Mardiah, Long Chiau Ming, Ismeldi Syarief, Muhammad Syarif Khairullah Suryadharma Putra, Nadyne Falisha, Regita Ayu Cahyani, Tsania Faiza Mardhatillah, Novia Elsaputri

Published in

MethodsX. Volume 17. Pages 104035. Epub Jul 07, 2026.

Abstract

Delays in receiving a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment continue to be a major public health concern, particularly in environments where financial status, cultural values, and religious beliefs have a significant impact on how individuals react to disease. However, there are still few established, culturally appropriate instruments for assessing Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs and comprehending how they contribute to patient delay. In this study, a protocol for evaluating HBM components and investigating their connection to patient delay among patients with BC in West Sumatra, Indonesia, is presented. A 31-item questionnaire encompassing six HBM domains: perceived risk, severity, benefits, barriers, self-efficacy, and cues to action was used to gather data from 250 BCE patients in this cross-sectional study. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five meaningful latent constructs, and one poorly performing item was removed to strengthen the instrument. Good internal consistency was shown by the final tool (Cronbach's α: 0.809-0.871). Associations between HBM components and patient delay were then examined through logistic regression using crude and adjusted models. The protocol proved practical and feasible in a community setting.

PMID:
42555458
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement