Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Retrospective Analysis of eFAST Exams to Detect COVID-19 in Trauma Patients.

Created on 06 Aug 2026

Authors

Nicholas Gossett, Michelle Thao Nguyen, Roy Almog, Andy Hsueh, Soheil Saadat, Megan Guy, Edmund Hsu, Madison Nashu, Ronald Goubert, Amanda Dos Santos, Andy Nguyen, Matthew Whited, Jessa Baker, John Christian Fox

Published in

Emergency medicine international. Volume 2026. Pages 6173255. Epub Jul 10, 2026.

Abstract

This original research study evaluates the utility of pulmonary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) within the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (eFAST) exam to detect asymptomatic COVID-19 in emergency department trauma patients. Specifically, it examines whether lung findings, such as B-lines, pleural thickening, and subpleural consolidations, can indicate a COVID-19 infection.
This retrospective review includes trauma patients aged 18 years or older who underwent eFAST and COVID-19 swab testing at the University of California, Irvine Medical Center, from December 2020 to October 2022. Two blinded reviewers analyzed eFAST scans for more than two B-lines, irregular pleural interface, or subpleural consolidations, with discrepancies resolved by ultrasound fellows. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
A total of 152 patients were included. Of 41 eFAST scans positive for COVID-19 findings, six were confirmed by PCR testing, yielding a positive predictive value of 15.6% (CI: 7.9%-25.6%). Among the 111 eFAST scans negative for COVID-19, 10 were PCR-positive, giving a negative predictive value of 91.0% (CI: 84.1%-95.6%). Sensitivity was 37.5% (CI: 15.2%-64.6%), and specificity was 74.3% (CI: 66.1%-81.4%).
Lung POCUS within the eFAST exam is not a reliable tool for detecting asymptomatic COVID-19 infection in trauma patients due to limited sensitivity and low positive predictive value. Standard diagnostic methods, such as PCR testing, and the use of personal protective equipment should remain the primary approach to protect healthcare providers.

PMID:
42555460
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement