Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Bronchiectasis with elevated liver enzymes and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency].

Created on 06 Aug 2026

Authors

A Y Li, W J Zhou, Y L Yang, J Li, Y X Li, Y Q Wang, Q L Chen, J P Fan, Y P Liu, X L Tian

Published in

Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases. Volume 49. Issue 8. Pages 857-861. Aug 12, 2026.

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related disorder (CFTR-RD) is an increasingly recognized genetic condition characterized by CFTR dysfunction without fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for cystic fibrosis. With the widespread application of genetic testing, an increasing number of patients with CFTR protein dysfunction have been identified; however, many do not meet the typical diagnostic criteria for cystic fibrosis. CFTR-RD may involve multiple organ systems and presents with heterogeneous and complex clinical manifestations, posing significant challenges for diagnosis and management. Here, we report the case of an adolescent male with bronchiectasis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Genetic analysis revealed a maternally inherited heterozygous intronic CFTR variant. Based on the clinical manifestations and laboratory findings, the patient was highly suspected of having CFTR-RD despite not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for cystic fibrosis. This case underscores the importance of recognizing CFTR-RD in patients with multisystem involvement and atypical features of cystic fibrosis, and highlights the value of multidisciplinary evaluation in establishing an accurate diagnosis and developing an individualized treatment strategy.

PMID:
42557072
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement