Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association between Kinematic Patterns and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Created on 07 Aug 2026

Authors

L Stroobant, H Vermue, A VAN DE Cotte, N Arnout, S VAN Onsem, S A Banks, J Victor, A Chevalier

Published in

Acta orthopaedica Belgica. Volume 92. Issue 2. Aug 05, 2026. Epub Aug 05, 2026.

Abstract

While knee kinematics are well-documented in primary TKA, less is understood regarding revision TKA (rTKA), where altered soft tissue conditions may influence kinematics. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between kinematic parameters, specifically anteroposterior (AP) translation and post-cam engagement, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in rTKA patients.
Thirty patients who underwent rTKA between 2022 and 2024 were assessed at a minimum six-month follow-up. Tibiofemoral kinematics, measured as femoral AP translation relative to the tibia, were evaluated during open-chain flexion-extension (FE) and closed-chain exercises (sit-to-stand (STS) and a lunge) using fluoroscopy. Two clusters, categorized by higher and lower PROMs, were compared for AP translation and post-cam engagement.
In the medial compartment, the low-PROMs group exhibited a more anterior femoral position compared to the high-PROMs group, with statistical significance observed during mid-flexion of the STS (50.87% (SD, 4.04) vs. 47.57% (SD, 2.75); p = 0.043) and FE exercise (51.97% (SD, 3.83) vs. 48.55% (SD, 3.62); p = 0.037). No significant differences were found in the lateral compartment. Post-cam engagement did not differ between the groups in either open- or closed-chain exercises.
Poorer PROM scores were associated with a more anterior femoral position in the medial compartment during mid-flexion of STS and FE exercises. Further research is needed to explore the relationship between kinematic variations and PROMs in rTKA patients.

PMID:
42561440
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement