Physicomechanical properties of PMMA denture base resins reinforced with nanofibers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors

Bianca Tavares Rangel, Amanda Aparecida Maia Neves Garcia, Carolina Yoshi Campos Sugio, Vanessa Migliorini Urban, Simone Soares, Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior, André Ulisses Dantas Batista, Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek

Published in

Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB. Volume 34. Pages e20260076. Epub Aug 03, 2026.

Abstract

Despite the potential of nanofibers to reinforce poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) denture base resins, no consensus exists regarding their effects on material properties. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether the incorporation of nanofibers into PMMA denture base resins improves flexural strength and other physicomechanical properties when compared with unmodified PMMA.
This study followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on the Open Science Framework (). Searches were conducted on Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, and SciELO. Eligibility criteria included in vitro or in vivo studies comparing nanofiber-reinforced PMMA to conventional PMMA. The meta-analysis was conducted for flexural strength (the only property assessed in all studies). A subgroup meta-analysis was performed to explore heterogeneity between studies.
From the 1,893 initially screened articles, six were included. The investigated nanofibers included carbon, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, polyamide-6, polystyrene, cellulose, PMMA-cerium, and polyvinyl alcohol at concentrations from 0.1 to 23%. The evaluated properties included impact strength, flexural strength, fracture resistance, hardness, elasticity, toughness, surface roughness, contact angle, and spectrophotometric color analysis. While the qualitative analysis showed divergent findings regarding property improvement, the quantitative analysis revealed no significant differences in flexural strength between nanofiber-reinforced PMMA and conventional PMMA at the evaluated concentrations: PMMA vs. 0.5% PMMA (p=0.554), PMMA vs. 1% PMMA (p=0.847), PMMA vs. 3% PMMA (p=0.9825), and PMMA vs. 5% PMMA (p=0.222). However, subgroup analysis indicated higher flexural strength for the conventional PMMA when compared with nanofiber-reinforced PMMA, particularly at higher nanofiber concentrations (p<0.0001).
Incorporating nanofibers into PMMA resulted in no significant increase in flexural strength, showing inconsistent effects on other physicomechanical properties. Therefore, further standardized laboratory and clinical studies are needed to clarify its efficacy and clinical applicability.

PMID:
42561212
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.