Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) consensus statement on standardization and research requirements for intraoperative nerve monitoring in endocrine surgery.

Created on 07 Aug 2026

Authors

Katrin Brauckhoff, Agata Dukaczewska, Pietro Princi, Rick Schneider, Sam Van Slycke, Selen S Yaliman, Julia I Staubitz-Vernazza, Neil S Tolley, Kyriakos Vamvakidis, Ilias A Zorbas, Thomas J Musholt

Published in

The British journal of surgery. Volume 113. Issue 8. Aug 03, 2026.

Abstract

Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) is widely used in endocrine surgery, yet substantial heterogeneity exists in its documentation, interpretation, and reporting. This limits comparability across studies and hampers the evaluation of clinical outcomes.
A consensus process was conducted by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES), combining a systematic literature review, analysis of Eurocrine® registry data, a survey among ESES members, and a structured Delphi consensus process.
Considerable variability was identified in monitoring techniques, signal interpretation, and outcome reporting. Key areas requiring standardization include the definition of loss of signal, documentation of neuromonitoring parameters, reporting of technical settings, and objective assessment of vocal cord function. Based on these findings, a set of consensus statements was developed to define minimum requirements for IONM research and reporting.
This consensus statement provides a structured framework to improve standardization, data quality, and comparability in IONM research. Adoption of the recommendations may facilitate more robust evaluation of clinical outcomes and support future evidence generation in endocrine surgery.

PMID:
42561127
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement