Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Relationship Between Urinary tract Stones and Incident Hypertension Among Postmenopausal Women: Results from The Women's Health Initiative.

Created on 07 Aug 2026

Authors

Mahsa H Javadi, Danielle J Harvey, Nora Franceschini, JoAnn E Manson, James R Hébert, Bernhard Haring, Matthew Allison, John Robbins, Lorena Garcia

Published in

Annals of epidemiology. Pages 110258. Aug 06, 2026. Epub Aug 06, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate: whether self-reported urinary tract stones (UTS) are associated with incident hypertension in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative; potential effect modification by diet-related inflammation and lifestyle factors; whether recurrent UTS further increased risk.
We conducted a prospective cohort study of 100,562 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years without baseline hypertension. UTS were self-reported and modeled as a time-varying exposure. Effect modification by the dietary inflammatory index (DII®) and energy-adjusted DII (E- DIITM), physical activity, alcohol consumption, and neighborhood socioeconomic status were evaluated. Incident hypertension was assessed using Cox hazards models adjusted for age and metabolic, lifestyle, socioeconomic, and dietary factors.
In unadjusted models, UTS were associated with higher incident hypertension risk (HR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.11-1.45, p = 0.001) and after full adjustment(HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02-1.35; p =0.05). DII/E-DII did not significantly modify the association (interaction p> 0.20), while physical activity did (interaction p=0.03). Recurrent UTS increased hypertension risk versus no stone history (HR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02-1.28; p = 0.03), but not versus a single episode (HR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.96-1.23; p = 0.18).
UTS were associated with a modestly increased risk of hypertension in postmenopausal women.

PMID:
42562241
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement